In a previous article introducing computer bugs, the author mentioned that Google’s calculator service also contains numerous programming bugs. After analysis and computation, the existence of this bug can be specifically defined as “333 333 333 333 335”.
A so-called bug refers to an error lurking in computer code, defined as: “A program error (English: Bug) is a term in programming that refers to abnormal functionality, crashes, data loss, or unexpected interruptions caused by errors in the software itself during operation.”
Through step-by-step median analysis on Google’s search page, the author identified the magical number set: “333333333333335 – 333333333333333 = 2”. This seemingly normal equation, upon further computation, reveals that for the simple mathematical operation “333333333333335 – 333333333333334”, anyone with eyes can immediately see the correct answer should be 1. However, Google’s calculated result is inexplicably 0.
If the same calculation is performed using the calculator included with Microsoft Windows XP, the correct answer of “1” is obtained. Even when pushing the values to the calculator’s maximum limit, such as “99999999999999999999999999999999 – 99999999999999999999999999999998”, it still correctly yields “1”.
The author privately concluded: “Google’s server programming is inferior to Microsoft’s little calculator.” (Laughs)
At the very least, the author hasn’t seen any determination from Google to fix this error. This bug seems to have lingered in Google’s servers for years.
Next, we conducted response analysis on Google’s calculator by substituting large numbers to see if we could find any clues about the bug through correlation.
- “399999999999995 – 399999999999994 = 0”
- “1000000000000005 – 1000000000000002 = 0”
- “1333333333333335 – 1333333333333334 = 0”
- “2000000000000009 – 2000000000000003 = 0”
- “3000000000000009 – 3000000000000001 = 0”
- “9999999999999999999999999999999 – 9999999999999969799548763635712 = 0”
From the data listed above, it’s clear that the larger the computed values, the greater the computational error. This shows that Google’s calculator errors are not limited to cases like “333333333333335 – 333333333333335 = 0” or “N – (N-1) = 0” (where N is an algebraic symbol representing numbers greater than “333333333333335”).
Additionally, through single subtraction operations, it’s evident that this bug is not a logical design error (e.g., issues with the order of operations like addition/subtraction before multiplication/division). The author’s speculated reasons will be detailed further in the article below.
Although Google’s bug may seem like a minor issue, as long as there’s a probability of its occurrence, it could still trigger extremely serious events, potentially even involving life-threatening consequences, and its impact would be far more direct than the butterfly effect.
Below are a few hypothetical scenarios to illustrate why the author considers Google’s calculator bug to be extremely dangerous.
A genius scientist conducting research in a cutting-edge laboratory in a certain country happens to run out of battery in their engineering calculator. Their computer happens to be open to a web browser, which happens to be on Google’s homepage, and the scientist happens to have used Google’s calculator for some mathematical computations before.
Feeling too lazy to buy a new battery, the scientist casually uses Google’s calculator for a series of lengthy calculations.
Unbeknownst to the genius scientist, they are unaware of the Google bug introduced today. After completing the calculations, what starts as a mere difference of 1 ultimately causes the critical threshold of a nuclear power plant to be overestimated by double. Engineers who later reference this data happen to skip repeated verification and proceed to build the nuclear power plant. Then, clueless government officials joyfully attend the ribbon-cutting ceremony for the plant, basking in public adoration for a moment.
Unfortunately, shortly after the nuclear power plant begins operation, a severe explosion occurs because the nuclear reaction exceeds the critical threshold. High-ranking officials flee with their families on private jets to seek asylum abroad, while citizens swallow iodine pills like candy, kicking off a Hollywood-style apocalyptic saga for ordinary people (perhaps a bit extreme).
Second hypothetical scenario.
Although a small island nation in the northern Pacific has been destroyed, making global news outlets report frantically and rake in profits, the genius scientist still hasn’t realized that the disaster was caused by a calculation error due to Google’s bug.
One day, the same genius scientist is commissioned by the military to design a path-correction program for the M2000GX high-energy long-range beam cannon. The scientist still hasn’t bought a battery for their engineering calculator, their browser homepage has been forcibly set to Google’s search page since installing Chrome, and they happen to need to compute a mathematical equation. So, naturally, the scientist uses Google’s calculator again.
You know how movies go—military engineers, of course, happen to skip verification and proceed to manufacture the M2000GX high-energy long-range beam cannon. This time, no high-ranking officials want to admit their country built this cannon, so no ribbon-cutting ceremony is held.
After the beam cannon, blessed by the genius scientist, is produced, it lies quietly in a secret desert base, rumored to be near a few mysterious mountains where students and military personnel often disappear.
One day, Country U can no longer tolerate the evil atrocities of Country A’s government (actually, Country A’s rebels can’t afford to buy more weapons from Country U). So, Country U decides it’s time to activate the beam cannon to completely annihilate the region, upholding global peace and embodying the justice of the world police.
Unfortunately, shortly after the beam cannon is fired, a calculation error in the path-correction program (yes, the one blessed by the genius scientist) causes the high-energy beam, initially off by just 1, to veer in the opposite direction and land on Country R’s homeland with a deafening boom.
Country R, having been attacked by Country U’s military, isn’t one to take it lying down. Naturally, they can’t just swallow their pride, so Country R’s authorities decide to retaliate immediately. Not only do they recall all weapons previously sold and shipped to Country A, but they also activate all their domestic weaponry, launching a full-scale assault on Country U (and inadvertently Country A) to swiftly destroy Country U’s counterattack capabilities with overwhelming force.
However, Country U’s global air defense system has been secretly deployed worldwide, unbeknownst to Country R. Under global surveillance, Country U detects Country R’s counterattack and decides to launch a synchronized full-scale counterstrike.
The next scene shows all original targets perfectly hit, while astronauts on the International Space Station witness the most beautiful moment on Earth from space.
While the genius scientist is still wondering why the beam cannon misfired, they, along with the Earth, are split in half by the explosions, marking the extinction of humanity. (Okay, that’s even more extreme.)
The bug in Google’s calculator highlights a fundamental truth: even Google’s programming team, an elite collective of the world’s highest-educated and most intelligent minds, cannot escape the basic fact of human error: “As long as it’s designed by humans, it will inevitably have flaws.” No wonder the devil Arnold’s boss, “Skynet,” could destroy humanity (hey).
Alright, since the Earth has already been destroyed by that genius scientist (twice), let’s talk about why Google still hasn’t fixed this bug.
The author personally speculates (disclaimer: I don’t code, nor have I conducted any research; this is purely logical conjecture) that one possible reason lies in Google’s database system design and the astronomical amount of data it stores, which uses a specific format. The search bar extracts strings in the same format, and this symmetrical design allows for high processing efficiency. However, the original programmers overlooked issues with values like “333333333333335” or “N” causing format overflows or shortages during extraction and conversion, leading to computational errors. Thus, Google’s reluctance to fix the bug may stem from the fact that it would require a massive overhaul of the entire database conversion system, so they prefer to ignore this bug, which only appears in an auxiliary feature.
Or maybe Google just thinks it’s amusing (see scenarios one and two above).
This translation retains the original tone, humor, and technical details while ensuring clarity and natural flow in English. The exaggerated scenarios and playful references (e.g., to Skynet and Arnold Schwarzenegger) are preserved to maintain the article’s engaging and satirical style.
發佈留言